Dope. I've done plenty of Dope in my life, and had to come clean as well. Of course, this wasn't performance enhancing dope, and this wasn't during televised interviews, but was more likely in group meetings or smoke-filled rooms full of styrofoam coffee cups. And yes, a history of lying means others aren't going to believe what you say anyways. (How do you know an addict's lying? Their lips are moving. And, of course, beware of the crying addict. They are the most dangerous of them all.)
All of this to say I watched day one of the Lance Armstrong interview. I'm not going to pretend to know all the players, or be fully educated, or to have spent a ton of energy making an opinion, but here's a hodge-podge of thoughts;
Oprah was at times a prosecuting attorney, drilling with the facts and such, but on the human side let him off easy. I have seen how Oprah did James Frey from "A Million Little Pieces" and how she verbally castrated him (which she later apologized for). From the previews, it does seem that the more human and emotional side is coming out tomorrow.
Yes, Armstrong was trying to play the victim quite a bit and search for sympathy. Yes, he was coached by both his legal team and a PR firm. Yes, he still seems like a wilted, watered down version of an ass. It wasn’t a mea culpa, and he seemingly made the worst attempt at humor in the history of anybody anywhere who was ever tried to look for humor. ("But I didn't say she was fat...." What was that?) Cold, calculated pauses seemed to proceed each of his answers, and there was no sense of abject remorse or regret.
But I tried to keep asking myself what my daddy used to ask me to get me to think: "Would you want to be judged by the worst thing you ever did?"
All of this to say I watched day one of the Lance Armstrong interview. I'm not going to pretend to know all the players, or be fully educated, or to have spent a ton of energy making an opinion, but here's a hodge-podge of thoughts;
Oprah was at times a prosecuting attorney, drilling with the facts and such, but on the human side let him off easy. I have seen how Oprah did James Frey from "A Million Little Pieces" and how she verbally castrated him (which she later apologized for). From the previews, it does seem that the more human and emotional side is coming out tomorrow.
Yes, Armstrong was trying to play the victim quite a bit and search for sympathy. Yes, he was coached by both his legal team and a PR firm. Yes, he still seems like a wilted, watered down version of an ass. It wasn’t a mea culpa, and he seemingly made the worst attempt at humor in the history of anybody anywhere who was ever tried to look for humor. ("But I didn't say she was fat...." What was that?) Cold, calculated pauses seemed to proceed each of his answers, and there was no sense of abject remorse or regret.
But I tried to keep asking myself what my daddy used to ask me to get me to think: "Would you want to be judged by the worst thing you ever did?"
As for doping to enhance one's performance rather than to get high, the only way I can relate on any scale is marathon running and my ten year attempt at a Boston Qualifier. I was obsessed at times to qualify. It became the one thing that would make me feel worthy, the penultimate validation of my worth and power. I spent hours of training, even more hours of mental preparation revving my engines and studying training plans. I would do anything to accomplish this goal, but after falling short again and again, I was starting to think I was going to my grave with this goal unachieved.
But would I have cheated to get there? Would I be okay to run a BQ time if somehow they had shortened the course for me and nobody else could ever know?
Hell no, there would be no satisfaction whatsoever in that.
Hell no, there would be no satisfaction whatsoever in that.
Would I be okay to somehow electronically mess with my runners chip to take off 5 or 10 minutes off my time?
Hell no
Hell no
As a therapist, I've told many a client who has made horrible choices, that had I been where they were and experienced the sum of their experiences and then been at that same moment in time, I may have made that same horrible choice or even done much worse.
What bugs me most about the Armstrong situation, as is usually the case, is the cover up. His counter attack of destroying and suing and using the full powers of the 'LanceStrong' office to go against anyone who threatened his regime with the truth.
![]() |
| Armstrong's Tweet to his detractors, from many months ago. |
And then on Sunday, many of us will spend hours watching athletes doped up on the same drugs Lance has been using.
**Here's an interesting CNN interview with Betsy Andreu, who's quite unhappy with the interview.
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2013/01/18/ac-armstrong-andreu-reacts-to-intv.cnn
An interesting video on his body language
http://news.yahoo.com/video/expert-armstrong-body-language-unsettling-212029796.html



